Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:14340 RSA No. 1490 of 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 04TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.1490 OF 2012 (INJ) BETWEEN:
SRI. B. SHIVANNA, S/O LATE BOREGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, RESIDENTS OF MAHADESHWARA ROAD, KUMBARA KOPPALU, MYSURU - 570 121. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. MANJUNATH PRASAD V., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
SRI. SHIVAMADHU, S/O CHIKKANNA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/AT JANJAR NO.381, HEBBAL EXTENSION, MYSURU - 570 021.
2.
SRI. B. SWAMY, S/O LATE BOREGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/O MAHADESHWARA ROAD, KUMBARA KOPPALU, MYSURU - 570 021.
3.
SMT. DODDATHAYAMMA @ KEMPADEVAMMA W/O THIMMEGOWDA D/O LATE BOREGOWDA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/AT MEGALA RAMA MANDIRA, KUMBARA KOPPALU, MYSURU - 570 021.
4.
SMT. UMA DEVI W/O SRI. B. SHIVANNA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,
Digitally signed by GEETHAKUMARI PARLATTAYA S Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:14340 RSA No. 1490 of 2012
R/O MAHADESHWARA ROAD, KUMBARA KOPPALU, MYSURU - 570 021. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B S NAGARAJ, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
R2 TO R4 ARE SERVED)
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & DECREE DATED 02.09.2011 PASSED IN R.A.NO.730/2010 ON THE FILE OF III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, MYSURU, DISMISSING THE APPEAL FILED AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 16.6.2007 PASSED IN OS.NO.327/1996 ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL FIRST CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN.), MYSURU.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
ORAL JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for respondent no.1 is present.
None appears for appellant. Even on previous occasion there was no representation. This would indicate that appellant is not diligent in prosecuting appeal. Hence, appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE
GRD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 27