1 2025:CGHC:33660 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7214 of 2025 1 - Vijay Prakash Singh S/o Late S.P. Singh, Aged About 51 Years R/o New Sarkanda, Street No.3, Seepat Road, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Public Health And Family Welfare, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Deputy Secretary, Department Of Public Health And Family Welfare, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - Chief Medical And Health Officer, Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Chandresh Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Shreyansh Mehta, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 17/07/2025 1. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition claiming for the following reliefs:- “10.1 That the Hon'ble court may please to call for the entire records pertaining to the case of the petitioner. VEDPRAKASH DEWANGAN Digitally signed by VEDPRAKASH DEWANGAN Date: 2025.07.18 18:39:23 +0530 2 10.2 That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the impugned order dated 26/06/2025 (ANNEXURE-P-1) so far it relates to the petitioner. 10.3 That this Hon'ble court may further be pleased to pass any other order in favour of petitioner as it may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case with cost.” 2. After arguing for sometimes, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that, there is a provision under clause 8 of the transfer policy dated 05-06-2025 for making a representation before the transfer committee. Therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to move his representation before the said transfer committee and the said transfer committee may be directed to decide the representation, so filed by the petitioner, in accordance with law within the stipulated time frame. 3. The submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner is not opposed by the State counsel and would submit that he has no objection, if such a direction is to be given to the transfer committee to decide the representation of the petitioner, in accordance with law, within the stipulated time frame. 4. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to make his representation before the transfer committee as provided under clause 8 of the said transfer policy dated 05-06-2025, and if such representation is made to the said committee, the same shall be decided in accordance with law on its own merits within a further period of one 3 month from the date of receipt of the representation along with the copy of this order. 5. With the aforesaid observation, the present petition is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge ved