HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 4325 of 2006 Court No. - 93 HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. Ajit Kumar Verma, Advocate holding brief of Sri Parv Agarwal, learned counsel for the revisionist and learned AGA are present. 2. Learned counsel for the revisionist submits that the revisionist has been convicted and sentenced by the trial court itself, therefore, this revision has become infructuous and the revisionist does not want to press the instant revision any more and he prayed that the instant revision be withdrawn. 3. Learned AGA has no objection to the same. 4. Accordingly, the instant revision is disposed of as withdrawn. October 9, 2025 C. MANI Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Parv Agarwal, Sanjay Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Govt. Advocate (Tarun Saxena,J.) Union Of India Thru Inspector .....Revisionist(s) State of U.P. and Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- CHANDRAMANI VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad