Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32950 (KAR)

BASAVANNA v. CHANNABASAPPA

RSA/886/2012 · 2025-06-19

Anant Ramanath Hegde

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21290 RSA No. 886 of 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE REGULAR SECOND APPEAL No. 886 OF 2012 (DEC) BETWEEN: 1. BASAVANNA, S/O LATE PUTTASWAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/AT BASAVATTIGE VILLAGE, DODDAKOWLANDE HOBLI, NANJANGUD TALUK, MYSORE DISTRICT-571301. 2. B. RAVISHANKAR, S/O BASAVANNA, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/AT BASAVATTIGE VILLAGE, DODDAKOWLANDE HOBLI, NANJANGUD TALUK, MYSORE DISTRICT-571301. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI P. MAHESHA & KRISHNA B. J., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. CHANNABASAPPA, S/O PUTTASWAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT BASAVATTIGE VILLAGE, DODDAKOWLANDE HOBLI, NANJANGUD TALUK, MYSORE DISTRICT-571301. Digitally signed by VALLI MARIMUTHU Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21290 RSA No. 886 of 2012 2. SAMPATH, S/O PUTTASWAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/AT BASAVATTIGE VILLAGE, DODDAKOWLANDE HOBLI, NANJANGUD TALUK, MYSORE DISTRICT-571301. 3. DODDATHAYAMMA, W/O LATE PUTTASWAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/AT BASAVATTIGE VILLAGE, DODDAKOWLANDE HOBLI, NANJANGUD TALUK, MYSORE DISTRICT-571301. 4. NAGAMMA, D /O LATE PUTTASWAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT BASAVATTIGE VILLAGE, DODDAKOWLANDE HOBLI, NANJANGUD TALUK, MYSORE DISTRICT-571301. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI S. ANIL KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2; R3 & R4 ARE SERVED) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT & DECREE DATED 2.8.2011 PASSED IN R.A.No.550/2010 ON THE FILE OF I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, MYSORE, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 16.6.2010 PASSED IN OS.No.173/2007 ON THE FILE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, NANJANGUD. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21290 RSA No. 886 of 2012 CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellants submits that he has no instructions from the appellants and all his best efforts to contact the appellants have failed. The appeal is of the year 2012. This Court does not find any reason to adjourn the matter. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE MV, List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10