APHC010490442024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI fO FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE ^ PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE B S BHANUMATHI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4253 OF 2024 Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the Hon'ble High Court may pleased to punish the respondents U/s. Court Acts for willful and deliberate violation of Final 9429/2024 dated 23.08.2024. 10 to 12 of contempt's of ! order passed in WP No. Between: s V V Rambabu, S/o Venkata Contractor, Satyanarayana, Aged 45 years, Occ: Near Rayalam Bridge, Door No: 273107, Nehrupeta, Bhimavaram, West Godavari District. ...Petitioner AND 1- Sri G Sai Prasad, I.A.S. The State Principal Secretary to Government Resources Department, Guntur District. 2. Sri Peeyush Kumar, The State of Andhra Pradesh Secretary to Government Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its . Irrigation and CAD Water A.P. Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Rep by its Principal Finance Department, A.P. Secretariat ■■•V ICi 3. Sri C Nagarani, I.A.S, The District Collector, (Irrigation wing) West Godavari District at Bhimavaram 4. Sri Ch Devaprakash, The Superintending Engineer Irrigation and Water Resources Department, Irrigation Circle, Eluru, Eluru District. 5. Sri P Nagarjuna Rao, The Executive Engineer, Irrigation and Water Resources Department, G W Division, Nidadavolu, Eluru District. ...Respondents lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the Hon'ble High Court may be pleased to dispense with filing of the copy of the order dated 23.08.2024 passed in W.P. No. 9429 of 2024. Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri AnnamneedI Balakrishna Counsel for the Respondent No.2: Sri Nagaraju Pullagura Counsel for the Respondents No.1,3,4 & 5: M/s Sushma Yaganti The Court made the following order: I' APHC010490442024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3311] Friday, the Twenty Ninth day of August, Two Thousand and Twenty Five Present The Honourable Ms. Justice B.S.Bhanumathi Contempt Case No: 4253 of 2024 Between: ...Petitioner S.V.V. Rambabu and ...Contemnors Sri G.Sai Prasad and others Counsel for the petitioner: I.Annamneedi Balakrishna Counsel for the contemnors: I.Nagaraju Pullagura 2.Sushma Yaganti The Court made the following: 2 C.C.No.4253 of 2024 ORDER: The contempt case is filed under Sections 10 and 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondents for willful violation of the order of this Court dated 23.08.2024 passed in W.P.No.9429 of 2024. 02. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the order had been complied with and no order is required in this contempt case and requested to close the petition. 03. Hence, the contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this contempt case shall stand closed. Sd/- V DIWAKAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. Sri G Sai Prasad I.A.S., Principal Secretary, Irrigation and CAD Water Resources Department, Guntur District. 2. Sri Peeyush Kumar, Principal Secretary, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 3. Sri C Nagarani, I.A.S, The District Collector, (Irrigation wing) West Godavari District at Bhimavaram. 4. Sri Ch Devaprakash, The Superintending Engineer, Water Resources Department, Irrigation Circle, Eluru, Eluru District. 5. Sri P Nagarjuna Rao, The Executive Engineer, Irrigation and Water Resources Department, G W Division, Nidadavolu, Eluru District. 6. One CC to Sri. Annamneedi Balakrishna, Advocate [OPUC] 7. One CC to Sri. Nagaraju Pullagura, Advocate [OPUC] 8. One CC to M/s. Sushma Yaganti, Advocate [OPUC] 9. Two CD Copies A.P. Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Finance Department, A.P. Irrigation and SGM sree >V; HIGH COURT DATED: 29/08/2025 ORDER CC NO. 4253 OF 2024 s( 10 SEP 2025 ytSectio ££J.S |0 ImJ Co* CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE WITHOUT COSTS