Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32949 (RAJ)

NITIN @ RAHUL S/O OM PRAKASH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

SOSA/2075/2024 · 2025-09-10

Bhuwan Goyal, Inderjeet Singh

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:36578-DB] (1 of 2) [SOSA-2075/2024] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Criminal Misc Suspension Of Sentence Application No. 2075/2024 In D.B. Criminal Appeal No.400/2024 Nitin @ Rahul S/o Om Prakash, Aged About 34 Years, R/o 3G 2 Jp Nagar, Madar Ajmer P S Alwar Gate Ajmer Rajasthan ( Presently Confined In Central Jail Ajmer) ----Accused Applicant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr. Aditya Joshi Mr. Nishant Soni For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jitendra Singh Rathore, Addl.GA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 10/09/2025 1. Heard on suspension of sentence application. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that the accused-applicant has been falsely implicated in this matter. He further submits that statement of mother of the accused applicant was not recorded by prosecution during trial. He further submits that the hearing of appeal may take long time and prayed that sentence awarded to the applicant may be suspended and he be released on bail during the pendency of the appeal. 3. Learned Additional Government Advocate opposed the present application for suspension of sentence and submits that in [2025:RJ-JP:36578-DB] (2 of 2) [SOSA-2075/2024] the statement of PW14-daughter of the deceased recorded during trial she has leveled allegation of causing the various injuries by the applicant to her mother including head injury by using “Soti” & belt; she has further stated that the accused applicant has also caused various injuries upon her which has been considered by doctor PW-19. 5. We have heard counsel for the parties and perused the record. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the present case, also considering the statement of PW4, PW14 & PW19 and recovery of “Soti” & belt at the instance of the accused applicant, in our considered view, no case is made out for allowing this criminal miscellaneous suspension of sentence application. Hence, the suspension of sentence application is dismissed. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J Anu /18