272 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-6771-2025 Date of decision: 25.08.2025 MOHINDERPAL AND ANR ...PETITIONERS Versus PIRAMAL CAPITAL FINANCE LIMITED AND ORS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Present: Mr. Puneet Sharma Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Tanya Trehan, Advocate for Mr. Harsh Chopra, Advocate for respondent No.1. * * * * SHEEL NAGU, C.J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners-borrrowers contends that the loan account has been settled and the remaining installments have been rescheduled. The petitioners have a remedy to approach the Bank for settling their loan account or the DRT as the case may be, hence, the petition stands disposed of to avail appropriate remedy available to the petitioner. (SHEEL NAGU) CHIEF JUSTICE 25.08.2025 (SANJIV BERRY) kanika JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No KANIKA 2025.08.29 10:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document