PHOOLCHAND MEENA S/O LATE SHRI JAGDISH PRASAD MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/14173/2024 · 2025-01-17
Anil Kumar Upman
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32948 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32948 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:2512] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14173/2024 Phoolchand Meena S/o Late Shri Jagdish Prasad Meena, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Village Asojai, Meeno Ki Dhani, Chatarpura, Police Station Harmada, Jaipur. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur, District Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Shruti Singh Choudhary Mr. Rajesh Gadwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order 17/01/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.6/2024 registered at Police Station Harmada, District Jaipur (West) (Rajasthan) for the offence punishable under Section 306 of IPC. Later on, police filed charge- sheet in this matter for the offence punishable under Section 306 of IPC.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that marriage of the petitioner was solemnized with the deceased in the year
2001. Counsel submits that suicide was committed by deceased by hanging herself on account of petty domestic disputes. Counsel further submits that petitioner is in custody since 18.10.2024 and
[2025:RJ-JP:2512] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-14173/2024] trial will take considerable time. Further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner.
4. I have considered the contentions.
5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, as also the fact that charge-sheet has been filed in this matter; petitioner is in custody since 18.10.2024, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow this bail application.
6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Phoolchand Meena S/o Late Shri Jagdish Prasad Meena shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
7. Any observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /118