Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
CWP No.19278 of 2025
Decided on: 09.12.2025 _________________________________________________________________ Madhukar Singh
....Petitioner
Versus State of H.P. & Ors
…Respondents _________________________________________________________________ Coram
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr. Bonit Prakash, Advocate vice Mr. A.K.Gupta, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr. Y.P.S.Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General for respondents No.1 and 2.
Mr. Ajay Chauhan, Advocate, vice Mr. Ajay Dhiman, Advocate for respondent No.3.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Notice. Mr. Y.P.S.Dhaulta, learned Additional Advocate General and Mr. Ajay Chauhan, Advocate appearing vice Mr. Ajay Dhiman, learned counsel,, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respective respondents.
2.
Petitioner is serving in the respondent- Municipal Council Paonta Sahib and has prayed for direction to the
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes
- 2 - respondents to grant him work charge status from the date he completed eight years of service with all incidental benefits.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the issue involved in the writ petition and the relief prayed for by the petitioner is now covered by the decision rendered by the Hon’ble Apex Court in The State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. Versus Surajmani & Anr.2. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner would be satisfied in case the respondents are directed to examine his case in light of the aforesaid judgment within a fixed time schedule. Learned counsel for the respondents are not averse to this prayer.
4.
Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with direction to the respondents/ competent authority to consider and decide the case of the petitioner in accordance with law laid down in Surajmani2 and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within six weeks from today. Copy of the order so passed, be also communicated to the petitioner.
2 Civil Appeal No.1595 of 2025, decided alongwith connected civil appeals on 06.02.2025
- 3 -
Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also to stand disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua December 9, 2025
Judge R.Atal