Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32942 (KAR)

KARNATAKA WELFARE ASSOCIATION v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/51938/2019 · 2025-01-29

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:4127 WP No. 51938 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 51938 OF 2019 (GM-KSR) BETWEEN: KARNATAKA WELFARE ASSOCIATION, FOR THE BLIND, SHESHADRIPURAM, BANGALORE-560 020. REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY, SRI PARASHIVAMURTHY. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. GANESH CHOUDHARY., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. VARUN JAYKUMAR PATIL., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, VIDHANA SOUDHA, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. DEPUTY REGISTRAR, 4TH DIVISION, NO.146, 3RD FLOOR, SAHAKARI SOUDHA 3RD CROSS, MALLESHWARAM, BENGALURU-560 063. 3. MR N.P.AMRUTHESH S/O LATE PUTTASWAMY.N.C., AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, NO.15/1, 1ST FLOOR, 3RD CROSS, SAMPIGE ROAD, MALLESHWARAM, BANGALORE-560 003. Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:4127 WP No. 51938 of 2019 4. MR BHASKAR S/O NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER, AGED MAJOR, NO.69, 1ST MAIN ROAD, S.C.ROAD, NEHRU NAGAR, BANGALORE-560 020. 5. THE RETURNING OFFICER, KARNATAKA WELFARE ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND, SHESHADRIPURAM, BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. BASAVANNA.K.M., ADVOCATE FOR C/R3 & R4; SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR., AGA FOR R1 & 2; SRI. M.V.HIREMATH., ADVOCATE R6 & 7; R5-SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED; R3-PARTY-IN-PERSON) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Ganesh Choudhary., counsel on behalf of Sri.Varun Jaykumar Patil., for the petitioner has appeared in person. Counsel for the petitioner submits that a memo has been filed stating that the petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. Counsel therefore, submits that the memo may be placed on record and the petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:4127 WP No. 51938 of 2019 When queried, counsel for the petitioner submits that a conscious decision is taken by the advocate on record and the petitioner to withdraw the petition and if an order is passed, they shall not seek for recalling the order and will not file the Review Petition. The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioner and the memo is placed on record. The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 9