RANJAN KUMAR DALAI v. THE PRESIDING OFFICER AND ANOTHER
LPA/749/2025 · 2025-03-12
Sudhir Singh, Sukhvinder Kaur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32940 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32940 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
LPA-749-2025 (O&M)
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
LPA-749-2025 (O&M)
Date of decision:12.03.2025
RANJAN KUMAR DALAI
……Appellant
Versus
THE PRESIDING OFFICER & ANR.
…..Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH
HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR
Present:- Ms. Nupur Sood, Advocate; Ms. Mannat Anand, Advocate and Mr. Surya Kant, Advocate for the appellant.
SUDHIR SINGH, J.
CM-1912-LPA-2025
For the reasons given in the application, the same is allowed. Delay of 58 days in filing the appeal is condoned, subject to all just exceptions. LPA-749-2025
Challenge in the present instant intra Court appeal is to the order dated 09.12.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge, whereby a batch of 41 writ petitions, was disposed of and the workmen were held entitled to enhancement of compensation @ 20% over and above the awarded compensation. HIMANSHU 2025.03.24 17:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.
LPA-749-2025 (O&M)
-2-
2.
LPA-25-2025 titled as Gurdeep Singh Saini vs. Maruti Suzuki India Ltd., Gurgaon & anr., arising out of the same order passed by the learned Single Judge, has been disposed of by this Court vide order dated 12.03.2025.
3.
For the reasons recorded in the order dated 12.03.2025 passed in LPA-25-2025 (supra), the present appeal also stands
disposed of in the same terms.
[ SUDHIR SINGH ]
JUDGE
[ SUKHVINDER KAUR]
JUDGE
12.03.2025 himanshu
Whether speaking/reasoned
Yes/No Whether reportable
Yes/No HIMANSHU 2025.03.24 17:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.