Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32935 (RAJ)

AJAY SINGH SON OF JAGMOHAN SINGH v. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR

CW/17446/2024 · 2025-05-09

Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, Mukesh Rajpurohit

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:19695-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition(PIL) No. 17446/2024 Ajay Singh Son Of Jagmohan Singh, Aged About 26 Years, Resident Of Vill. - Rondkala, Tehsil And District- Karauli (Raj). ----Petitioner Versus 1. The District Collector, Karauli (Rajasthan) 2. The Sub Division Officer, Karauli (Rajasthan) 3. The Tehsildar, Tehsil Karauli (Rajasthan) 4. The Patwari Halka, Rondkala, Tehsil And District Karauli (Rajasthan) 5. Sh. Hakim Singh Son of Shri Ramji Lal, resident of Vill.- Rondkala, Tehsil & District- Karauli (Raj). 6. Sh. Lakhan Son of shri Ramji Lal, resident of Vill.- Rondkala, Tehsil & District- Karauli (Raj). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Babulal Nasuna for Mr. Atar Singh For Respondent(s) : Ms. Shikha Sharma for Mr. G.S. Gill, AAG HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKESH RAJPUROHIT Order 09/05/2025 1. Heard on application (IA No.1/2025) for amendment in the cause title. 2. Upon due consideration, the same is allowed. 3. Amended cause title is taken on record. 4. Since there is an allegation that private respondent Nos. 5 & 6 have encroached upon pasture lands of the prescription as given in the petition i.e. Khasra No.1188/367 situated at Revenue [2025:RJ-JP:19695-DB] (2 of 2) [CW-17446/2024] Village Rondkala, Tehsil and District Karauli and petitioner claims to have submitted representations, we are not inclined to keep this petition pending but dispose of the same with the direction to Tehsildar to draw appropriate proceedings subject to the condition that the petitioner submits a proper application under Section 91 of the Land Revenue Act, 1956 before Tehsildar, Tehsil Karauli within a period of one month from today. The Tehsildar shall verify the complaint and if prima facie complaint appears to be proper, the Tehsildar shall proceed to issue notice to those who are alleged to be encroachers, for which they may also be heard and then passed such order, as may be considered necessary in accordance with law. 5. The petition is disposed of accordingly. (MUKESH RAJPUROHIT),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),CJ NAVAL Gandhi/Gaurav/55