Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32932 (CHH)

GAYANDU BAGHEL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

MCRC/5331/2025 · 2025-07-16

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:33815 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 5331 of 2025 1 - Gayandu Baghel S/o Durjo Baghel Aged About 24 Years R/o Udiyapal, Police Station Bakawand, District Bastar (C.G.) 2 - Laxman Yadav S/o Bholadas Yadav Aged About 34 Years R/o Togankogera, Police Station Bakawand, District Bastar (C.G.) (Description of the applicants mentioned as per charge sheet) ... Applicants versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Of Police Station Bakawand, District Bastar (C.G.) ... Respondent For Applicants : Ms. Deblina Maity, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Shri Bharat Gulbani, PL Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 17/07/2025 1. This is the first bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) for GOURI MUDALIAR Digitally signed by GOURI MUDALIAR Date: 2025.07.18 19:12:23 +0530 2 grant of regular bail to the applicants who have been arrested in connection with Crime No.33/2025 registered at Police Station Bakawand, District Bastar (C.G.). for the offence punishable under Sections 34 (2) & 36 of C.G. Excise Act. 2. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that on a secret information received by the police and on the said information, a raid was conducted and recovered total 19.080 liters of English Liqour from the vehicle of the applicants, therefore crime has been registered against the present applicants and other accused person and filed the charge sheet before the concerned Court. 3. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants have been falsely implicated in this case and 19.080 liters of English Liqour was not seized from the exclusive possession of the applicants. She further submits that under Section 34(2) of the C.G. Excise Act, minimum punishment is one year and maximum punishment is three years. She also submits that the applicants are in jail since 31/05/2025 and the conclusion of the trial is likely to take quite long time. Therefore, she prays for grant of regular bail to the applicants. 4. Learned counsel for the State/non-applicant would oppose the bail application and submit that the charge-sheet has been filed in the present case before the competent Court and the applicants have no criminal antecedents. He further submits that 19.080 liters of 3 English Liqour was recovered from the possession of the applicants, therefore, they are not entitled for grant of bail. 5. I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the case diary. 6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, nature and gravity of allegation levelled against the applicants and the fact that the applicants have no criminal antecedents, they are in jail since 31/05/2025 and the charge-sheet has been filed, further the conclusion of the trial may take some more time, this Court is of the view that the applicants are entitled to be released on bail in this case. 7. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed and it is directed that the applicants -Gayandu Baghel and Laxman Yadav involved in Crime No.33/2025 registered at Police Station Bakawand, District Bastar (C.G.). for the offence punishable under Sections 34 (2) & 36 of C.G. Excise Act, be released on bail on each of them furnishing a personal bond with two sureties in the like sum to the satisfaction of the Court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicants shall file an undertaking to the effect that they shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse 4 of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (ii) The applicants shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through their counsel. In case of their absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against them under Section 269 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. (iii) In case, the applicants misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure their presence, proclamation under Section 84 of BNSS. is issued and the applicants fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against them, in accordance with law, under Section 209 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. (iv) The applicants shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 351 of BNSS. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicants is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such 5 default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against them in accordance with law. 8. Office is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court for necessary information and compliance forthwith. - Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice gouri