APHC010488412010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: Between: 1. NAMATHOTI SALOMI & ANOTHER, W/O. SURYAPRAKASH, D/O. YAZALI PRABHUDAS R/O. D.NO. 7 SANJEEVAIAHNAGAR, BACK SIDE OF HIGH SCHOOL, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. NAMATHOTI VARAPRASAD, S/O. SURYAPRAKASH, AGED 3 1/2 YEARS, PRESENTLY CUSTODY OF HIS MOTHER, NG, I.E THE 1ST PETITIONER R/O. D.NO. 7 BACK SIDE OF HIGH SCHOOL, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 1. NAMATHOTI SURYAPRAKASH ANOTHER, S/O. MANIKYARAO R/O. GORANTLA VILLAGE, GUNTUR RURAL MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. STATE OF A P, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P. AT HYDERABAD. Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toto set aside the Order dated 17-11-2009 made in M.C. No. 9 of 2009 on the file of the Court of Judge, Family court-Cum-Addl. District Judge, Guntur, and allow the Criminal Revision awarding an amount of Rs. 7,500/ IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 288 OF 2010 NAMATHOTI SALOMI & ANOTHER, W/O. SURYAPRAKASH, D/O. YAZALI PRABHUDAS R/O. D.NO. 7-6-842, 4TH LANE, SANJEEVAIAHNAGAR, BACK SIDE OF HIGH SCHOOL, GUNTUR, NAMATHOTI VARAPRASAD, S/O. SURYAPRAKASH, AGED 3 1/2 YEARS, PRESENTLY CUSTODY OF HIS MOTHER, NG, I.E THE 1ST PETITIONER R/O. D.NO. 7-6-842, 4TH LANE, SANJEEVAIAHNAGAR, BACK SIDE OF HIGH SCHOOL, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND NAMATHOTI SURYAPRAKASH ANOTHER, S/O. MANIKYARAO R/O. VILLAGE, GUNTUR RURAL MANDAL, GUNTUR STATE OF A P, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P. AT HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toto set aside the 2009 made in M.C. No. 9 of 2009 on the file of the Court of Addl. District Judge, Guntur, and allow the Criminal Revision awarding an amount of Rs. 7,500/- to each of the revision petitioners. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3369] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO NAMATHOTI SALOMI & ANOTHER, W/O. SURYAPRAKASH, D/O. 842, 4TH LANE, SANJEEVAIAHNAGAR, BACK SIDE OF HIGH SCHOOL, GUNTUR, NAMATHOTI VARAPRASAD, S/O. SURYAPRAKASH, AGED 3 1/2 YEARS, PRESENTLY CUSTODY OF HIS MOTHER, NG, I.E THE 1ST 842, 4TH LANE, SANJEEVAIAHNAGAR, BACK SIDE OF HIGH SCHOOL, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) NAMATHOTI SURYAPRAKASH ANOTHER, S/O. MANIKYARAO R/O. VILLAGE, GUNTUR RURAL MANDAL, GUNTUR STATE OF A P, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT ...RESPONDENT(S): praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toto set aside the 2009 made in M.C. No. 9 of 2009 on the file of the Court of Addl. District Judge, Guntur, and allow the Criminal to each of the revision petitioners. IA NO: 1 OF 2010(CRLRCMP 407 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant an amount of Rs.7,500/- per month to each of the petitioners or such other reasonable amount as interim maintenance, pending disposal of the above Criminal Revision Case Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. N SRIRAM MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. BHASKARA RAO BANDARUPALLI 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: ORDER:- This Criminal Revision Case is filed under Sections 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C. aggrieved by the order dated 17.11.2009 passed by the Family-cum- Additional District Judge, Guntur, in M.C.No.9 of 2009. 2. Heard. Perused the entire material on record. 3. Pursuant to the directions of this Court dated 09.4.2025, the Secretary- cum-Civil Judge (Senior Division), District Legal Services Authority, Guntur, submitted a report stating that there are no matrimonial disputes pending before the Family Court, Guntur. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that despite best efforts, he could not trace out the address particulars of the petitioner though he tried to contact to the address shown in the petition. 5. In the said facts of the case, having no other go, this Court is inclined to dismiss the petition. 6. In the result, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed for non- prosecution. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in the Criminal Revision Case, shall stand closed. ____________________________ JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO Dated: 07.8.2025 TJN 208 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 288 OF 2010 Dated:07.8.2025 TJN