Sandhya Devi v. State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors. CMP No.22175 of 2025 in Execution Petition No.637 of 2025 16.12.2025 Present: Mr. Vivek Singh Thakur, Advocate, for the applicant/petitioner. Mr. Rajan Kahol and Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Ravi Chauhan and Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General, for non- applicants/respondents. While placing on record copy of office order dated 15.12.2025, issued under the signature of Engineer-in-Chief HPPWD Shimla, Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General, states that respondents after having considered case of the petitioner in light of Balo Devi, Sunder Singh and Roop Lal’s cases, have allowed family pension in favour of the applicant/petitioner subject to outcome of the petition being filed by the respondent-State in Roop Lal’s case. Necessary direction already stands issued to Executive Engineer Bharmour Division, HPPWD Bharmour, to take all necessary steps for extending the benefit of judgment to the applicant/petitioner at the earliest. Having carefully perused aforesaid document, which is taken on record, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present application and as such, same is disposed of with direction to the Executive Engineer, Bharmour Division, to ensure that all consequential benefits flowing from aforesaid compliance, if not already released, are released expeditiously, preferably, within two months. December 16, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), manjit Judge