Somandhepalli Praveena, v. State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/24883/2025 · 2025-09-14
Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32918 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32918 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010488542025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 24883 OF 2025 Between: Somandhepalli Praveena,. W/o G. Prakash Reddy, Aged 42 years, R/o. Paapireddy Palle Village, Budili Post, Gorantia Mandal, Sri Satya Sai District. ...Petitioner AND State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Government, Amaravathi, Guntur District. District Collector, Sri Satya Sai District. Revenue Divisional Officer, Penukonda Revenue Division Sai District. Tahsildar, Chilamathur Mandal Sri Satya Sai District. 1. to Revenue Department Secretariat, Velagapudi,
2. 3. Sri Satya
4. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the inaction on the part of 4th respondent on my online Mee-seva application No.MUT250215055870 in Form 6A dated 15.02.2025 submitted for granting Pattadar Pass book and title deed and also
to mutate my name in all online web land revenue records for landed feperties to an extent of Ac. 10.46 cents in Sy.No.111, Ac.8.00 cents in Sy.No.112-2, Ac.4.69 cents in Sy.No.114-3 and Ac.3.20 cents in Sy.No.126-2 situated at Chagaleru Village, Chilamathur Mandal Sri Satya Sai District as illegal, irregular, irrational and amounts to conferred on him under the non discharge of legal obligation provisions of Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Passbooks Act, 1971 and rules framed there under and offends consequently direct the cum Title Deed and mutate to my said land. Articles 14 and Article 21 of Constitution of India and 4th respondent to grant me Pattadar Passbook my name in all online web land revenue records connected lA NO: 1 OF 20?.*^ Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to consider and decide my Mee-seva Application No. MUT250215055870 iin Form 6A dated 15.02.2025 submitted for granting Pattadar Pass book and title deed and also to mutate for landed properties to an extent of Ac.
10.46 cents in Sy.No.111, Ac.8.00 cents in Sy.No.112-2, Ac.4.69 cents in Sy.No.114-3 and Ac.3.20 cents in Sy.No.126-2 V situated at Chagaleru Village, Chilamathur Mandal, Sai District pending disposal of the main writ petition. my name in all online web land revenue records Sri Satya Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI PATHURI SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent N os.1 to 4: GP FOR REVENUE / The Court made the following order:
APHC010488542025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] r MONDAY.THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 24883/2025 Between:
1.SOMANDHEPALLI PRAVEENA,, W/0 G. PRAKASH REDDY, AGED 42 YEARS, R/0. PAAPIREDDY PALLE VILLAGE, BUDILI POST, GORANTIA MANDAL, DISTRICT. SRI SATYA SAI ...PETITIONER AND 1.STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, DISTRICT. 2.DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. 3.REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, PENUKONDA REVENUE DIVISION, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. 4.TAHSILDAR, CHILAMATHUR MANDAL DISTRICT. AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR SRI SATYA SAI ...RESPONDENT{S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS more declaring the inaction on the part of 4th respondent on my online Mee- seva application No.MUT250215055870 in Form 6A dated 15.02.2025 submitted for granting Pattadar Pass book and title deed and also to mutate my name in all online web land revenue records for landed properties to an extent of Ac.
10.46 cents in Sy.No.111, Ac.8.00 cents in Sy.No.112-2, Ac.4.69 cents in Sy.No.114-3 and Ac.3.20 cents in Sy.No.126-2 situated at Chagaleru Village, Chilamathur Mandal, Sri Satya Sai District as illegal, irregular, irrational and amounts to non discharge of legal obligation conferred on him under the provisions of Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Passbooks Act, 1971 and rules framed there under and offends Articles 14 and Article 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 4th respondent to grant me Pattadar Passbook cum Title Deed and mutate my name in all online web land revenue records connected to my said land and pass lA NO: 1 OF 2025
2 Petition under Section 151 CPC circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to consider and decide my Mee- seva Application No. MUT250215055870 in Form 15.02.2025 submitted for granting Pattadar Pass book and title deed and also to mutate my name in all online web land revenue records for landed properties to an extent of Ac. 10.46 cents in Sy.No.111, Ac.8.00 cents in Sy.No.112-2, Ac.4.69 cents in Sy.No.114-3 and Ac.3.20 cents in Sy.No.126-2 V Chilamathur Mandal, Sri Satya Sai District pending disposal of the main writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.PATHURI SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR REVENUE praying that in the 6A dated situated at Chagaleru Village
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.24883 of 2025
ORDER:- Pithiiy, this writ petition is filed on the ground that application bearing No.MUT250215055870 dated 15.02.2025, was made to the authorities, but it was not addressed. Therefore, it is urged that the respondents be directed to address the application, as such direction would suffice in the circumstances of the case. The Hon’ble Apex Court in The Government of India vs P.
2. Venkatesh^ held as follows:
“...Dispose of the representation mantra is increasingly permeating the judicial process in the High Courts and the Tribunals. Such orders may make for a quick or easy disposal of cases in overburdened adjudicatory institutions. But, they do not service to the cause of justice. The litigant is back again before the Court, as this case shows, having incurred attendant costs and suffered delays of the legal process. This would have been obviated by calling for a counter in the first instance, thereby resulting in finality to the dispute...” This Court is not oblivious of the fact that a Court to authorities.
3. before directing "consideration" of a claim or representation should examine whether the claim or representation is with reference to a
"live" issue or whether it is with reference to a "dead" or "stale" issue, stale" issue or dispute, the If it is with reference to a
"dead" or i Court/tribunal should put an end to the matter and should not direct (2019) 15 see 613
4
consideration or reconsideration. If the Court to tribunal deciding to direct "consideration" without itself examining the merits, it should make it clear that such consideration will be without prejudice to any contention relating to limitation or delay and laches. Even if the court does not expressly say so, that would be the legal position and effect."
4. Disposal of proceedings by seemingly innocuous orders directing consideration of representation though result in quick or easy disposal of cases in overburdened adjudicatory institutions but such orders do more disservice than service to the cause of justice. However, the respondents are
directed that the petitioner’s application bearing No.MUT250215055870 dated 15.02.2025, be considered by examining thoroughly, issue orders accordingly, and communicate the decision to the petitioner. It goes without saying that the entire process will be completed within six (06) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
5.
6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no
order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/- K J RAJA BABU assistant registrar sectioKi officer //true copy// To,
1. Principal Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.
2. District Collector, Sri Satya Sai District.
3. Revenue Divisional Officer, Penukonda Revenue Division, Sri Satya Sai District.
4. Tahsildar, Chilamathur Mandal S" ®?opgcT''- ^
7. Two CD Copies. y AL'
HIGH COURT TL DATED:15/09/2025
ORDER WP NO. 24883 OF 2025 I 2 3 SEP 2025 g ^ . Current Section .
DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS