APHC010488872018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 23082/2018 Between: 1. KANIGOLLA DHANA LAKSHMI,, W/O. KANIGOLLA SATYANARAYANA AGED 58 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, RIO. GOLLAGUDEM, DWARAKA TIRUMALA, BHIMADOLU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. PRL SECY HOME DEPT STATE OF A P, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, DWARAKA TIRUMALA POLICE STATION, BHIMADOLU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT 3. KOTHA LAKSHMI KUMARI, W/O. KOTHA SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, AGED 50 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, D.NO. 2-70, SURAPPAGUDEM, BHIMADOLU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. KOTHA SURYANARAYANA MURTHY, FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED 62 YEARS. OCC. BUSINESS, R/O.D.NO.2-70. SURAPPAGUDEM, BHIMADOLU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. KOTHA SATYA SURESH KUMAR, S/O. KOTHA SATYANARAYANA MURTHY AGED 27 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. D.NO. 2-70, SURAPPAGUDEM, BHIMADOLU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus directing the 2nd Respondent herein to provide police protection to the Petitioner herein for implementation of the decree and judgement dated 24-11-2017 passed in O.S.No.330 of 2017 on the file of the Court of Principal Senior Civil Judge, Eluru for consequential direction to the 2nd Respondent herein to take action against Respondents 2 3 to 5 herein as per law for violation of the decree of judgment dated 24.11.2017 passed in O.S.No.330 of 2017 on the file of court of Principal Senior Civil Judge, Eluru and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M V SURESH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. TURAGA SAI SURYA The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “ ... to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus directing the 2nd Respondent herein to provide police protection to the Petitioner herein for implementation of the decree and judgement dated 24-11-2017 passed in O.S.No.330 of 2017 on the file of the Court of Principal Senior Civil Judge, Eluru for consequential direction to the 2nd Respondent herein to take action against Respondents 3 to 5 herein as per law for violation of the decree of judgment dated 24.11.2017 passed in O.S.No.330 of 2017 on the file of court of Principal Senior Civil Judge, Eluru and to pass ....” 2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for the official respondents and learned counsel appearing for respondents 3 to 5. Perused the material on record. 3. Learned counsel for respondent No.3 to 5 would submit that Petitioner obtained an ex-parte decree against the respondents 3 to 5 and thereafter, respondents 3 to 5 filed a restoration petition and the suit in OS No.330 of 2017 was restored to its file. Learned counsel would submit that subsequently, the suit 3 was dismissed for default vide order dated 18.07.2023 and that the relief has become infructuous. 4. Learned counsel for Petitioner would submit recording the said submission this writ Petition may be disposed of. 5. In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 23082 of 2018 17.07.2025 Mjl /*