909-CA-13085-2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13085 OF 2024 IN SAST/14280/2024 Shri Vijay S/o Harakchand Tatiya VERSUS Shri Vishal S/o Dilip Patil ... Ms. Devika Patil, Advocate h/f Mr. Mahesh Sonawane, Advocate for Applicant Mr. M. P. Kulkarni, Advocate h/f Mr. A. S. Sawant, Advocate for Respondent No. 1 … CORUM : ROHIT W. JOSHI, J. DATE : 12th MARCH, 2025 PER COURT : 1. Registration of SAST No. 14280 of 2024 came to be refused vide order dated 24.07.2024 passed by the learned Registrar (Judicial) on account of failure on the part of the applicant/appellant in Second Appeal to remove office objections. There is a delay of 92 days in filing the application challenging the aforesaid order. 2. With a view to give one opportunity to the applicant, I am inclined to condone the delay of 92 days caused in filing application as also to allow the application by setting aside the order dated 24.07.2024 passed by the learned Registrar (Judicial) on the condition that all office objections will be removed within a period of two weeks from today. 3. On all office objections being removed Second Appeal be restored to file. [ROHIT W. JOSHI] JUDGE KS_Kamble/ 2025:BHC-AUG:8101