APHC010488402024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] WEDNESDAY ,THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 25156/2024 Between: 1. NAGINENI SAIBABU, S/O LATE VENKAIAH, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/O D.NO.6-65, NUNNA VILLAGE, VIJAYAWADA RURAL MANDAL, NTR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYATH RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI CAPITAL CITY, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLCTOR PANCHAYATHS, NTR DISTRICT, VIJAYAWADA. 3. THE DISTRICT PANCHAYATH OFFICER, NTR DISTRICT, VIJAYAWADA. 4. THE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, VIJAYAWADA RURAL MANDAL, NTR DISTRICT. 5. NUNNA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REP., BY ITS PANCHAYATH SECRETARY, NUNNA, VIJAYAWADA RURAL MANDAL, NTR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 2 1. SUBBA RAO KORRAPATI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV 2. Yarraguntla.Koteswara Rao,Standing Counsel For Zilla Praja Parishads,Mandal Praja Parishads and Gra The Court made the following ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri Subba Rao Korrapati, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner; Sri Panuku Rajesh Kumar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj and Rural Development and Sri V. Sai Kiran, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri Y. Koteswara Rao, learned Standing Counsel for ZPPs, MPPs and Gram Panchayat. 2. On 03.03.2025, this Court has passed the following Order: “3. The Written Instruction would indicate that the Gram Panchayat has encroached upon the land of the Petitioner. Having identified the encroachment, the Gram Panchayat has removed the encroachment between 11.02.2025 and 17.02.2025. 4. Sri Subba Rao Korrapathi, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner seeks time to obtain Instructions from his client. 5. List the matter on 05.03.2025 immediately after the motion list.” 3. Sri Subba Rao Korrapati, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, on instructions from his Client, would submit that the encroachments have been removed by the Official Respondents, and therefore, no further consideration is required. 4. In this view of the matter, this Writ Petition is closed, in view of the fact that the grievance of the Writ Petitioner has been appropriately redressed by the Official Respondents. No Order as to Costs. 3 5.Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 05.03.2025 JKS 4 73 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION No. 25156 OF 2024 05.03.2025 JKS