IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 20286/2025 Decided on: 23.12.2025 Vikram Singh & Ors. …Petitioners Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents. ……………………………………………………………………………. Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners: Mr. Bhim Raj Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Vishwadeep Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 to 3. Ms. Shrutika Chauhan, Advocate vice Mr. Dheeraj Vashisht, Advocate for respondents No.4 to 7. Sushil Kukreja, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Vishwadeep Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General and Ms. Shrutika Chauhan, learned vice counsel, accept notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3 and 4 to 7, respectively. 2. Petitioners’ grievances are that their respective representations Annexure P-5(colly), seeking applicability of Yashwant Kumar Vs. State of H.P. & Ors., CWP No. 8148 of 2022, 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes 2 decided a/w connected matters on 21.03.2024, have not been decided till date by the respondents/competent authority. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners would be content, in case, respondents No.4 to 7/competent authority are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representations of the petitioners, in accordance with law, within a time bound manner. Learned Additional Advocate General has no objection to this prayer. Having regard to the above submissions, but without examining the merits of the matters, the writ petition is disposed of by directing respondents No.4 to 7/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representations of the petitioners, in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment in case of Yashwant Kumar, within a period of six weeks from today. The order so passed be also communicated to the petitioners. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (Sushil Kukreja) Judge 23rd December, 2025(rohit)