APHC010489252018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 23058/2018 Between: 1. SMT. KOPPOLU RATNA KUMARI, W/O KOPPOLU RAJA RAO AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/O VASEPALLIPADU VILLAGE TANGURU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT ONGOLE. 3. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ZILLA PRAJA PARISHAD, ONGOLE. 4. THE MANDAL DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, PAMURU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DITRICT. 5. KOPPOLU RAJA RAO, S/O SUBBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC. SUPERINTENDENT, O/O MDO, PAMURU, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declare the inaction of the respondent authorities in taking any steps to withhold the retirement benefits of 5th respondent herein to enable the petitioner to recover the maintenance amount awarded in M.C.No.25/1995 dt.16-11-2005, in spite of the legal notice dt.15-4-2018, followed by her personal visits, as being illegal, arbitrary and unjust, and consequently, declare that the petitioner is entitled to recover the maintenance amount from out of the retirement benefits of the 5th respondent who is likely to retire to within couple of months. 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent authorities to withhold the retirement benefits of 5th respondent herein by considering the legal notice dt.15.4.2018, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M KALYAN RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. VENKATA REDDY GAJJALA SC FOR ZPP, MPP, AND GRAM PANCHAYAT 2. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV (AP) The Court made the following: 3 HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 23058 of 2018 ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “.... to issue an appropriate Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the inaction of the respondent authorities in taking any steps to withhold the retirement benefits of 5th respondent herein to enable the petitioner to recover the maintenance amount awarded in MC. No.25/1995 dt.16.11.2005 in spite of the legal notice dt.15.4.2018 followed by her personal visits as being illegal, arbitrary and unjust and consequently, declare that the petitioner is entitled to recover the maintenance amount from out of the retirement benefits of the 5th respondent who is likely to retire to within couple of months and to grant.....” 2. The earlier Docket Proceedings would show that none represented for the Petitioner and the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “For Dismissal”. 3. Despite the matter being listed under the caption “For dismissal”, none represented for the Petitioner today. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader is in attendance. 5. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 19.06.2025 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 7270 of 2018 19.06.2025 Mjl /*