- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:3227 WP No. 51973 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 51973 OF 2019 (GM-BWSSB) BETWEEN: SRI. HANUMANTHAPPA S/O. SRI. DODDAMUNINAGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/AT NO. 17/8, 1ST MAIN ROAD, MARENAHALLI, VIJAYANAGAR, BANGALORE-560 040. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. M.J.ALVA., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. BANGALORE WATER SUPPLY AND SEWERAGE BOARD (BWSSB), CAUVERY BHAVAN, BANGALORE-560 001, BY ITS CHAIRMAN. 2. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, BANGALORE WATER SUPPLY AND SEWERAGE BOARD, BANGALORE (WEST)-4, SUB-DIVISION, RPFC LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGAR, BANGALORE-560 001. 3. SMT. GOWRAMMA W/O. LATE S.MALLAPPA, MAJOR, 4. SRI. RAVISHANKAR S/O. LATE S. MALLAPPA, MAJOR, Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:3227 WP No. 51973 of 2019 5. SRI. MANJA S/O. LATE S. MALLAPPA, MAJOR, RESPONDENT NO.3 TO 5 ARE R/AT NO. 43, 1ST MAIN ROAD, MARENAHALLI, VIJAYANAGAR, BENGALURU-560 010. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K.B.MONESH KUMAR., ADVOCATE FOR R1 & 2; SRI. P.D.SURANA., ADVOCATE FOR R3 TO 5) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.M.J.Alva., counsel for the petitioner and Sri.K.B.Monesh Kumar., counsel for respondents 1 and 2 have appeared in person. 2. The captioned Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus directing respondents 1 and 2 to implement the order dated 20.08.2019 passed by the second respondent in ¸ÀASÉå: ¨ÉAdªÀÄA/¸ÀPÁ¤C(¥À)-4/¸À(ZÀA.§)-2/911/2019-20 vide Annexure-E within a time frame. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:3227 WP No. 51973 of 2019 3. Heard the arguments and perused the Writ papers with care. 4. Counsel for the petitioner in presenting his arguments contends that respondents 3 to 5 have failed to comply with the directions of BWSSB and the BWSSB has not taken any action in the matter. Hence, the petitioner has sought a mandamus. Counsel therefore, submits that an appropriate order may be passed. 5. It appears that the petitioner has grievance against private respondents 3 to 5 for not obeying the directions of BWSSB. If at all the petitioner has any grievance, he may agitate his grievance before the appropriate forum in accordance with the law, if so advised. 6. Resultantly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 38