Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32896 (RAJ)

RANJEET @ RENIYA S/O SHRI BADRILAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

SOSA/1830/2023 · 2025-05-23

Bhuwan Goyal, Narendra Singh Dhaddha

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Criminal Misc 2nd Suspension Of Sentence Application No. 1830/2023 In D. B. Criminal Appeal No.227/2019 Ranjeet @ Reniya S/o Shri Badrilal, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Village Ramnagar P.s Budhadeet Dist. Kota (Presently Confined At Central Jail Kota) ----Applicant-Accused Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor 2. Victim, R/o ----Respondents For Applicant(s) : Mr. Amit Dadhich, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jitendra Singh Rathore, Addl.G.A. & Mr. Aman Kumar, AAAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 23/05/2025 1. Heard on 2nd application for suspension of sentence. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case. He is behind the bars for more than 10 years. So, looking to the custody period of the applicant, sentence awarded to him by the trial court be suspended, till disposal of the appeal. 3. Learned Addl.G.A. has opposed the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the applicant and submitted that allegation against the applicant is that the applicant had raped a minor girl of four and a half years. So, looking to the gravity of offence, (2 of 2) [SOSA-1830/2023] previous suspension of sentence application filed by the applicant was dismissed by this court vide order dated 29.03.2022. Thereafter, there is no change in the merits of the case. So, 2nd application for suspension of sentence filed by the applicant be dismissed. 4. We have considered the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned Addl.G.A. 5. Looking to the gravity of offence and the nature of allegation of committing rape by the accused applicant with the minor girl of four and a half years of age, we do not consider it a fit case to suspend the sentence of the applicant during the pendency of the appeal. 6. Therefore, the 2nd suspension of sentence application filed by the applicant stands dismissed. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J (NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J Gourav/02