Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:30845
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7148 of 2025 1 - Bharosa Ram Porte S/o Shri Shukla Singh Porte Aged About 46 Years R/o Gobahar P.S. Pendra, District : Gaurela-Pendra-Marwahi, Chhattisgarh
--- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya Atal Nagar New Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Director Directorate Of Public Instructions, Indravati Bhawan Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Joint Director Education Division, Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 4 - The Collector Gourela-Pendra-Marwahi, Chhattisgarh 5 - The District Education Officer Gourela-Pendra-Marwahi, Chhattisgarh 6 - The Block Education Officer Marwahi, District Gourela-Pendra-Marwahi, Chhattisgarh
--- Respondent(s) WPS No. 7184 of 2025 1 - Smt. Versha Verma W/o Pradeep Kumar Aged About 41 Years R/o Siltara Sai Vihar, Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.)
---Petitioner(s) Versus SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Digitally signed by SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Date: 2025.07.08 11:05:23 +0530
2 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary School Education Department Mantralaya Atal Nagar New Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Director Directorate Of Public Instruction Indrawati Bhawan Atal Nagar New Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The Collector Raipur (C.G.) 4 - The District Education Officer And Secretary District Rationalization Samiti District - Raipur (C.G.) 5 - The Block Education Officer Dharsinwa District - Raipur (C.G.)
--- Respondent(s) WPS No. 7159 of 2025 1 - Smt. Sulochana Kesharwani W/o Dilip Kesharwani Aged About 58 Years R/o Near Gurunanak Chowk, Kabir Nagar, Telibandha, Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh
---Petitioner(s) Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - The Director Directorate Of Public Instructions, Indravati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - The Collector Raipur Chhattisgarh 4 - The District Education Officer And Secretary District Rationalization Samiti, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh 5 - The Block Education Officer Dharsinwa, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh
--- Respondent(s)
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Goutam Khetrapal, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ajit Singh, Govt. Advocate
3 Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J.
Order on Board 07/07/2025
1. By way of these writ petitions, the petitioners are challenging the impugned transfer orders and action of the respondents, whereby the petitioners have been declared surplus Teachers and consequently transferred under the Teacher Rationalization Instructions.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners have not joined at their transferred place. It is further submitted that list of surplus Teachers published by the respondents is against the Rationalization Instructions and the same is arbitrary, as no proper opportunity of hearing was given to the petitioners, and if the petitioners are not granted relief, they will suffer with irreparable loss.
Learned counsel for the petitioners would further submit that the petitioners still want to pursue their representation before the concerned authorities to redress their grievances.
3.
Learned counsel for the State would submit that after due verification of records, the petitioners have been transferred under the Rationalization Instructions issued by the State Government. It is further submitted that, if the petitioners are having any grievance, they may move fresh representation before the concerned District/Divisional Rationalization Committee and the Committee will take a decision on their representation, in accordance with law, within a stipulated period.
4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the pleadings and documents.
4
5. In view of submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the petitioners are directed to make fresh representation before the concerned District/Divisional Rationalization Committee within a period of 05 days from today, and thereafter, the Committee shall decide the same within a further period of 05 days from the date of receipt of representation, in accordance with law, in objective manner.
6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the present writ petitions stand disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge sagrika