(132) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-6354-2023 (O&M) Date of decision:- 28.07.2025 Harminder Singh ...Petitioner(s) Versus Additional District Magistrate, Fatehgarh Sahib and others ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Present:- Mr. Arunjeet Singh Kakkar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Vipin Pal Yadav, Additional Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. Nitin Grover, Advocate, for respondents No. 2 to 4. * * * * SHEEL NAGU, C.J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the rival parties do not dispute that the entire amount so settled under One Time Settlement (OTS) Scheme has been paid by the petitioner-borrower. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent-bank informs that the loan account stands closed. 3. Accordingly, the petition stands infructuous and is dismissed as such. (SHEEL NAGU) CHIEF JUSTICE (SANJIV BERRY) JUDGE 28.07.2025 Amodh Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No AMODH SHARMA 2025.07.28 18:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgement