Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32891 (ALL)

RAVI KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/10043/2025 · 2025-04-07

Deepak Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:50546 Court No. - 67 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10043 of 2025 Applicant :- Ravi Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Qazi Vakil Ahmad Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J. 1. Counter affidavit, filed today, is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant; counsel for the informant; learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 3. The instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.802 of 2024, registered under Sections 352, 324,(4), 109, 125, 131 BNS, P.S. Chakeri, District Kanpur Nagar, during pendency of the trial. 4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The applicant is not named in the F.I.R. He next argued that identically placed co-accused, namely, Kuldeep Thakur has been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 20.03.2025 passed in Crl. Misc. Bail Application No.1954 of 2025. He further submits that since the role of the applicant is not distinguishable with the role of co-accused, therefore, the applicant is also entitled to be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity. The applicant has no criminal history. He is languishing in jail since 07.10.2024. In case, he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in trial. 5. On the other hand, learned AGA and counsel for the informant vehemently opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute parity with co-accused. 6. Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and the fact that the case of the applicant is similar to that of co-accused, who have been granted bail and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed. 7. Let the applicant, Ravi Kumar be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified. (i) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial. (ii) The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment. (ii) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail. 8. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. Order Date :- 8.4.2025 Meenu Singh Digitally signed by :- MEENU SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad