1 2025:CGHC:48213 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 1632 of 2019 * - Raju Yadav S/o Shri Samaru Yadav Aged About 41 Years R/o Dumartarai, Police Station Mana Camp, Tahsil And District Raipur, Chhattisgarh (Claimant) ... Appellant Versus 1 - Deman Sahu S/o Shri Sohan Lal Sahu Aged About 34 Years R/o Village Kharbada, Tahsil And Thana Kurud, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh. (Driver Of Offending Vehicle Metador Bearing Registration No. C.G. 04/G-2330), District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh 2 - Raviraja Gulati S/o Shri Kishorilal Gulati Aged About 27 Years R/o Near Bus Stand, Abhanpur, Police Station Abhanpur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. (Owner Of The Offending Vehicle Metador Bearing Registration No. C.G. 04/G-2330)., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Orienal Insurance Company Ltd, Through Divisional Manager, Madina Building, Katchari Chowk, Jail Road, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. (Insurer Of Offending Vehicle Metador Bearing Registration No. C.G. 04/G- 2330), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Appellants : None appeared even in two rounds For Respondents : None appeared even in two rounds Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 18/09/2025 1. The appellant/claimant has filed this appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for enhancement of compensation against the award passed by the learned VIIIth Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) in Claim Case No. Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI Date: 2025.09.22 11:12:14 +0530 2 41/2015 dated 17.05.2019, wherein and whereby the learned Clams Tribunal directed to make payment of compensation to the tune of Rs.40,00/- with interest @ 7% per annum from the date of filing of the application till realization and has fastened the liability upon the respondents 1 to 3 jointly and severally to pay compensation. 2. The matter is called twice, no one appeared on behalf of the appellant in the first round as well as in the second round. In these circumstances, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti