Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32883 (CHH)

ANAND JAISWAL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/1826/2018 · 2025-01-27

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:4741 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1826 of 2018 Anand Jaiswal S/o Shri Prakash Jaiswal Aged About 26 Years R/o- Malviya Ganj, Tahsil And District- Katni, Madhya Pradesh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through- Police Station- Kota, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Vijay Kumar S/o Shri Sunderlal Jaiswal Aged About 45 Years R/o- Alfart Ganj, Katni, Tahsil And District- Katni, Madhya Pradesh. 3 - Sandeep Jaiswal @ Jeetu S/o Shri Shiv Kumar Jaiswal Aged About 28 Years R/o- Khirhani Fatak, Katni, Tahsil And District- Katni, Madhya Pradesh. 4 - Shiv Kumar Jaiswal S/o Shri Sunderlal Jaiswal Aged About 45 Years R/o- Alfart Ganj, Katni, Tahsil And District- Katni, Madhya Pradesh. 5 - Ganesh Jaiswal S/o Shri Chhulu Lal Jaiswal Aged About 50 Years R/o- In Front Of Head Post Office Lane, Tahsil And District- Katni, Madhya Pradesh. ---- Respondent For Petitioner : None. For Respondent : Ms. Smriti Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 27.01.2025 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with following prayer: RAJSHEKHAR SONI Digitally signed by RAJSHEKHAR SONI 2 “ It is therefore most humbly prayed that, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the instant petition and the impugned order dated 23.08.14, passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Kota, District – Bilaspur (C.G.), in Complaint Case No. Unregistered/14 in the matter between “Anand Jaiswal V/s Vijay Kumar & ors” may kindly be quashed and the application filed by the petitioner u/s 91 of the Criminal Procedure Code 1973 may kindly be allowed, in the interest of justice. ” 2. None appears nor is any representation made on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition when the case is called out. 3. It appears that the petitioner has lost his interest to pursue this matter. 4. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed on this ground alone. 5. Let a copy of this order be sent to the trial court concerned forthwith for necessary information and compliance, if so require. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Rajshekhar