Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32882 (JHR)

ANIMESH SAMANTA ALIAS BAPI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./8309/2025 · 2025-12-06

Ambuj Nath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. ( 2025:JHHC:36628 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 7320 of 2025 ------ Avijeet Samanta, aged about 27 years, S/o. Late Ashok Samanta, R/o. Ambagan Near Hanuman Mandir, P.O. & P.S.- Mihijam, Dist. Jamtara, Jharkhand. … … Petitioner -Versus - The State of Jharkhand ... … Opposite Party With B.A. No. 8309 of 2025 ------ Animesh Samanta @ Bapi, aged about 35 years, S/o. Late Ashok Samanta, R/o. Ambagan, Near Hanuman Mandir, P.O. & P.S.- Mihijam, Dist. Jamtara, Jharkhand. … … Petitioner -Versus - The State of Jharkhand ... … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: - HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH ------ For the Petitioners : Mrs. Nidhi Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Satish Prasad, A.P.P. : Mr. Arup Kr. Dey, A.P.P. For the Informant : Mr. Kumar Harsh, Advocate ------ 04/06.12.2025 Heard the parties. 2. Both these bail applications arise out of the same police case. Accordingly, both these cases are being disposed of by a common order. 3. The petitioners have been made accused in connection with Mihijam P.S. Case No. 72/2023, for the offences registered under Sections 420, 467, 506/34 of the I.P.C., pending in the Court of Ms. Shalika Anna Herenz, learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Jamtara. 4. It is alleged that accused persons including these petitioners lured the informant for purchasing Maruti Dzire car for consideration amount of Rs. 1,60,000/-. They also told him that the purchased car will be hired by the office of Superintendent of Police, Jamtara. The informant paid Rs. 1,60,000/- to the accused persons. Subsequently, petitioner was told that the said car has met with an accident and two persons have died in the accident and they have to manage the police. They took money from the informant on several occasions. The informant paid total sum of about Rs. 76,60,000/- to the accused persons. Later on, the informant came to know that he has been cheated. 5. From perusal of the Case Diary, it transpired that money was transferred to the account of the accused persons. 6. Considering the nature of allegation, I am not inclined to release the petitioners, on bail. Accordingly, their prayer for bail stands rejected. 6 December 2025 (Ambuj Nath, J.) Rahul /- Uploaded On - 09 .12.2025