Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3288 (CHH)

VIRENDRA KUMAR WARE v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/316/2025 · 2025-02-07

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:7709-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 316 of 2025 1 - Virendra Kumar Ware S/o Late Shyam Lal Ware Aged About 62 Years R/o Mig- 1/33, Near New Water Tank, Behind Vindhya Public School, Kabir Nagar, Raipur ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Ps- Dadhi, Bemetara (C.G.) 2 - Shankuntala Devi W/o Dhruw Kumar Markandey Aged About 59 Years R/o Viii- Surki, P.S. Dadhi, District- Bemetara, C.G. 491335 ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Navneet Kumar Yadav, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Hari Om Rai, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 07/02/2025 1. Heard Mr. Navneet Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Hari Om Rai, learned Panel Lawyer, appearing for the Respondent/State. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer: 2 "I. Allow the present petition and, II. Quash the FIR No. 0169/2024, registered at Police Station Dadhi on the date of 17.11.2024 against the petitioner. III. Pass any other or further order as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case." 3. At the time of hearing, this Court has observed that the petitioner has filed the present petition without appropriate prayer which is defective one, therefore, we are not inclined to entertain the present petition with such a vague and sketchy prayer as there is offence in the prayer have not mentioned to which learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh with proper prayer. 4. Learned State counsel has no objection. 5. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty, as prayed for subject to depositing a sum of Rs. 1,000/- as cost by the petitioner in the Registry of this Court within a period of one week from today and the said amount shall be transmitted to the Government SAA, District Bemetara (C.G.). Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Alok ALOK SHARMA Digitally signed by ALOK SHARMA Date: 2025.02.13 19:05:36 +0530