APHC010487382007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 28341/2007 Between: 1. B.V.S.S.N.M. RAO,, S/O. B. NAGESHWARA RAO, E.NO. 350136, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, SHRAMIK, VIDYADHARAPURAM DEPOT, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. APSRTC MUSHIRABAD ANOTHER, MUSHEERABAD, HYDERABAD, REP. BY ITS VICE CHAIRMAN & MANAGING DIRECTOR. 2. THE REGIONAL MANAGER, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, KRISHNA REGION, VIJAYAWADA. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toTo issue an order direction or writ more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus or any other appropraite writ (i) declaring the proceedings No.E1/255(1) /2006-VDP, dated 15-6-2006 in so far as denying the monitory benefits and serivce from the date of removal to till the date of appointment as Shramik as illegal, arbitrary and unjust'; (ii) declaring the action of the Respondents in not paying the salary from 28-9-2005 to 15-6- 2006 as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and contrary to Section 47 of Act 1 of 1996 (ii) declaring the action of the Respondents in not protecting the scale of the petitioner in the post of Driver as illegal and arbitrary, and (iv) consequently direct the respondents to release the salary from 28-9-2005 to 15-6-2006 and fix the pay of the petitioner from the date of removal to till date of reinstatement as Shramik by duly protecting the scale of pay of the of last drawn by the petitioner and release all consequential benefits and pass such other order or orders as this Hon;ble court july deem fit and proper in the interest of justice. IA NO: 1 OF 2007(WPMP 37036 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to protect the pay of last drawn by the petitioner in which he was holding as on the date of issuance of issuance of proceedings dated 15-6-2006 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K UDAYA SRI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. C PRAKASH REDDY(SC FOR APSRTC) The Court made the following: ORDER Despite listing the matter under the caption “for dismissal”, there is no representation for the petitioner. This shows that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the matter. In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI RR