[2025:RJ-JP:1862] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14105/2024 Khushvant S/o Hemraj, R/o Davir, Police Station Sapotra, District Karauli (Rajasthan) (Presently Confined In District Jail, Karauli). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajneesh Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 13/01/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS., on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.495/2023 registered at Police Station Sapotra, District Karauli (Raj.) for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 452, 506, 504 of IPC & Section 3/25 of Arms Act. Later on, police filed charge-sheet for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 506, 504 of IPC & Sections 3/25 & 9 of Arms Act. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that it is a case of no injury. He submits that as per charge-sheet, no sign of firing was found on the place of incident. Later on, a country-made pistol has been shown to be recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Petitioner is in custody since 28.08.2024. Charge-sheet has been filed & trial of [2025:RJ-JP:1862] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-14105/2024] the case will take considerable time. Further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner. He submits that petitioner is a habitual offender as five other cases have been registered against him. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by both the parties, especially the fact that charge-sheet has been filed in this matter; looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. The observations made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner - Khushvant S/o Hemraj, shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence on once in every month in the concerned police [2025:RJ-JP:1862] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-14105/2024] station. 8. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J GAUTAM JAIN /95