Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32867 (CHH)

GYANI SOHAN SINGH (DEAD) THROUGH LEGAL HEIRS HARPAL SINGH GILL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/4206/2021 · 2025-07-07

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

-1- NAFR HIGH COURT of CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4206 of 2021 Gyani Sohan Singh (Dead) Through Legal Heirs Harpal Singh Gill Age 40 Years, S/o Late Gyani Sohan Singh R/o Village - Kashibahra (Presently Known As B. K. Bahara) Tahsil - Bagbahara, District - Mahasamund Presently Residing At Gurudwara Nadimod, Ghoda Post - Birkoni District - Mahasamund Chhattisgarh, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department of Revenue, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur District - Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - The Commissioner (Revenue), Raipur Division, District – Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - The Collector, Mahasamund District - Mahasamund Chhattisgarh, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh. 4 - The Director, Department of Horticulture, Directorate, Indrawati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 5 - The Assistant Director, office of The Assistant Director Horticulture, Department of Horticulture, Tahsil And District Mahasamund, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh. 6 - Village Panchayat Kashibahara Tahasil Bagbahara, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause Title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Jitendra Nath Nande, Advocate State : Ms. Shailja Shukla, Deputy Government Advocate For Respondent No.6 : Mr. Surfaraj Khan, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board Digitally signed by NADIM MOHLE -2- 08.07.2025 1) At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would seek permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to prefer a duly constituted revision under Section 50 of the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code, 1959. 2) Not opposed by the other side. 3) Permission granted. 4) Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as stated above. 5) It is expected that the learned revisional authority shall consider the issue of limitation taking a liberal view, as the matter remained pending before this Court for considerable period. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge NADIM