IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.882 of 2021 Decided on: 07.10.2025 _________________________________________________________________ Chattar Singh Rana and Anr ....Petitioners Versus State of H.P. & Anr. …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua 1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioners: Mr. Shivom Vashista, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. L.N.Sharma, Additional Advocate General ________________________________________________________________ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge CMP No.24209 of 2025 Allowed and disposed of. CWP No.882 of 2021 With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, matter is heard at this stage 2. This petition has been filed for grant of following reliefs: - “i). A writ in nature of mandamus may kindly be issued for directing the Respondents to treat the Petitioners 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? - 2 - as appointed against regular post, against the post reserved for physically challenged category in view of the mandate of Section the Persons with Disability (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights Full Participation) Act, 1995 alongwith all admissible consequential benefits. ii) That the Respondents may kindly be directed to count the services rendered by the Petitioners w.e.f. 1995 to the date of their regularization i.e. 2006 and 2007 as qualifying service for the purpose of pension and the Petitioners may very kindly be held entitled to receive pension as per CCS Pension Rules 1972, in the interest of justice.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that case of the petitioners and reliefs prayed for, have been adjudicated upon in Nitin Kumar Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and Anr2. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners would be content if the cases of the petitioners are considered by the respondents in light of the aforesaid judgment. Learned Additional Advocate General has no objection to this prayer. 4. Having regard to above submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondents to consider the respective cases of the petitioners in light of the aforesaid 2 CWPOA No.1077 of 2019,decided on 22.08.2022 - 3 - judgment and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. The decision so arrived at, shall be communicated to the petitioners. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also to stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge October 7, 2025 R.Atal