1 2025:CGHC:33587 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3613 of 2025 1 - Maniyaro Kujur W/o Kunwar Say Kujur Aged About 49 Years R/o N.C. 26, C S E B Colony Korba, District Korba C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Of Revenue, Secretariat, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur C.G. 2 - Collector, Korba, Distt- Korba C.G. 3 - Sub Divisional Officer (Rev.) Korba, District- Korba C.G. 4 - Tahsildar- (Najul) Korba, District- Korba C.G. 5 - Revenue Inspector Najul, Korba, District- Korba C.G. 6 - Patwari, Patwari Halka No. 18, Rishdi, Tahsil And District Korba C.G. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pawan Kesharwani, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Anurag Tripathi, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge Order on Board 17/07/2025 1. By way of the present petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs: “10.1 That, the Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue appropriate writ/order/direction quashing the 2 impugned order dated 17.12.2021 and letter dated 25.06.2025 (Annexure P/1) issued by respondent no. 4. 10.2 That, the Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue appropriate writ/order/direction commanding respondent authorities not to demolish the Boundary wall of the petitioner’s hospital and not to interfere with the possession of the petitioners on the subject land. 10.3 Any other relief, direction, which Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is challenging the legality, validity and propriety of the impugned order dated 17.12.2021 and letter dated 25.06.2025 whereby the Tahsildar (Najul) passed an order of a proceeding under Section 248 of Land Revenue Code and passed an order of ejectment of boundary wall constructed by the petitioner around her Hospital premises and also imposed fine of Rs. 20,000/- against the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the state submits that there is an alternate remedy available to the petitioner under Section 44(1) of C.G. Land Revenue Code, 1959. 4. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties and perused the record with utmost circumspection. 3 5. Considering the submissions of the counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State, this Court directs the petitioner to file an appeal under Section 44(1) of C.G. Land Revenue Code, 1959 within 15 days from today, if law permits and in turn the respondents are directed to decide the appeal filed by the petitioner, in accordance with law, expeditiously as soon as possible. The respondents are also directed not to take any coercive steps against the petitioner for the above period of 15 days. 6. With the aforesaid direction, the present petition is disposed of. 7. Certified Copy today. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) JUDGE Madhurima