IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 647 of 2019 Decided on: 07.10.2025 Sh. Krishan Chand … Petitioner Versus Satluj Jal Vidyut Nigam Ltd. and another … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Vinay Mehta, Advocate. For the respondents : Ms. Devyani Sharma, Senior Advocate with Ms. Srishti Negi, Advocate for respondent No. 1. : Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, Addl. AG for respondents No. 1 and 2. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that there is a technical fault in the writ petition as the documents appended therewith do not relate to the present petitioner but to some other person, whose name is identical to the petitioner, therefore, this petition be permitted to be withdrawn, with liberty to approach the Court afresh. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty, as prayed for, subject to all just exceptions. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge October 07, 2025 (narender) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?