SAMSERUDDIN AHMED AND ANR v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS.
WP(C)/7079/2025 · 2026-05-07
Kardak Ete
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3286 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3286 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010271812025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/7079/2025 SAMSERUDDIN AHMED AND ANR S/O-SIDDIQUE ALI VILL-CHENIBARI P.O- BHERBHERI BILLP.S- DHULA DIST- DARRANG, ASSAM 2: ABDUL KUDDUS S/O-LT. MINNAT ALIVILL- RAJAHAULI P.O-BHERBHERI BILL P.S- DHULA DIST- DARRANG ASSA VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS.
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY,REVENUE AND DISASTERMANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT,GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, DISPUR,GUWAHATI-06 2:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER DARRANG AT MANGALDAI ASSAM.
3:THE CIRCLE OFFICE PUB MANGALDAI REVENUE CIRCLE MANGALDAI ASSAM 4:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PWD(R)
Page No.# 2/3 DARRANG AT MANGALDAI ASSAM.
5:SRI BICHITRA BASUMATARY CONTRACTOR OF THE ROAD NAMELY - FROM PUTHIA GHATTO PUTHIMARI ROAD MAJORSUBA TO CHENIBARI RAJAHAULIUNDER SIPAJHAR KALAIGAONCENTRAL ROAD CIRCLE SIPAJHAR PO- BHERBHERI PSDHULA DIST- DARRANG ASSAM.
6:MAZIBAR RAHMAN S/O-LT. MINNAT ALI VILL- RAJAHAULI P.O- CHAMUAKHATP.S- DHULADIST- DARRANG ASSAM PIN-784190 7:SARFUL IMANUR RAHMAN S/O- MAZIBAR RAHMAN VILL- RAJAHAULIP.O- CHAMUA KHATP.S- DHULADIST- DARRANG ASSAMPIN-78419 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M U MAHMUD, MRS. M SAIKIA,S SEKH,A A HAZARIKA,MR S H MAHMUD Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, PWD ROAD,SC, REVENUE
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 08-05-2026 It is submitted by Mr. M.U. Mahmud, learned counsel for the petitioners that the relief sought for in this writ petition has already been redressed as reflected in the affidavit-in- opposition filed by the State respondent. Ms. G. Hazarika, learned standing counsel for the Revenue Department and Mr. J.
Page No.# 3/3 Handique, learned State counsels are present. As agreed to by learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition stands closed as the relief sought for by the petitioners is stated to have been redressed.
JUDGE. Comparing Assistant