Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3286 (AP)

LAKSHMIKAR REDDY v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/895/2025 · 2025-01-27

B S Bhanumathi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE MS JUSTICE B. S. BHANUMATHI WRIT PETITION NO: 895 OF 2025 Between: Lakshmikar Reddy, S/o. Madan Mohan Reddy, Aged about 35 years, Occ; Un-employee, Resident of D.No.5-19, Kothapalli, H/o. Thuvvapall, K.V.Palli Mandal, Annamayya District. ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Food and Civil Supplies (CS-I) Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi. The District Collector (CS), Annamayya District at Rayachoty. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Rayachoty, Annamayya District. The Tahsildar, K.V.Palli Mandal, Annamayya District. Sri Kurra Nagarjuna, S/o not known. Aged about 25 years, Occ: Un employee, Resident of D.No.4-55, Thuvvapalli Village, K.V.Palli Mandal, Annamayya District. 2. 3. 4. 5. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ, or Direction especially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3'''^ respondent in entertaining only application and selecting the 5^'' respondent as Fair Price Shop Dealer for Shop No. 1009048, situated in Kothapalli H/o Thuvvapalli Village, K.V.Palli Mandal, Annamayya District by ignoring the reservation and roaster as well as procedure as contemplated under law is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violation of principles of natural justice and also violation of conditions as prescribed in the Notification vide Ref.No.B/1083/KVP/2024, dated.23-12-2024 of the 3^^^ respondent and consequently set aside the same. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to suspend the operation of the Notification vide Ref.No.B/1083/KVP /2024, dated 23-12-2024 of the 3rd respondent issued for selection of Fair Price Shop Dealer for Shop No. 1009048, situated in Kothapalli H/o Thuwapalli Village, K.V.Palli Mandal, Annamayya District, pending disposal of the Writ petition before this Honourable court. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI VUTUPALLI RAJANNA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2 : GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3 & 4 : GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.5 : NONE APPEARED The Court made the following: ORDER APHC010014802025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3311] MONDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE B S BHANUMATHI WRIT PETITION NO: 895/2025 Between: Lakshmikar Reddy ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.VUTUPALLI RAJANNA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE 2.GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India is filed for the following relief: “...to issue writ or direction especially one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 3^'^ respondent in entertaining only application and selecting the 5‘^ respondent as fair price shop dealer for Shop No. 1009048 situated in Kothapalli H/o Thuvvapalli village, K.V.Palli mandal, Annamayya district by ignoring the reservation • and roster as well as procedure as contemplated under law is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violation of principles of natural justice 2 BSB,J W.P.No.895 of 2025 and also violation of conditions as prescribed in the notification vide reference No.B/1083/KVP/2024 dated 23.12.2024 of the 3'"^ respondent and consequently set aside the same and pass such other order orders ” or 2. Sri Vutupalli Rajanna, the learned counsel for the petitioner, requested permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition. 3. In view of the representation made on behalf of the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- M. SRINIVAS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// sectk5n officer To, 1. One CC to Sri Vutupalli Rajanna, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP for Civil Supplies, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 3. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 4. Three C.D. Copies. Cnr V. HIGH COURT DATED:27/01/2025 g 0 6 FEB 2025 a ^ ^ Curtwl Socuon \4£«patc*!«S^ ORDER WP.No.895 of 2025 DISMISSING THE W.P. AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS