Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32849 (KAR)

SRI. DEVANANTH NAYAK v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/25471/2024 · 2025-07-10

M Nagaprasanna

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25149 WP No. 25471 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 25471 OF 2024 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SRI DEVANANTH NAYAK S/O ANANTHA SRIDHARA NAYAK AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS R/AT “ADALA HOUSE”, ALIKE VILLAGE, BANTWALA TALUK DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT PIN CODE NO. 574 325. …PETITIONER (BY SRI U.PANDURANGA NAYAK, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT M.S.BUILDING BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER DAKSHINA KANANDA DISTRICT MANGALURU - 575 001. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER MANGALURU SUB-DIVISION MANGALURU – 575 001. Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25149 WP No. 25471 of 2024 4. THE TAHASILDAR BANTWAL TALUK B.C.ROAD, JODUMARGA POST BANTWAL – 574 219 DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT. 5. SRI CHENNAPPA POOJARY AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS S/O LATE SESU POOJARY R/O CHENDUKALA HOUSE ALIKE VILLAGE, S.S.VIHARA POST BANTWALA TALUK DASKHINA KANNADA DISTRICT PIN CODE – 574 325. 6. SRI RAGHAVA POOJARY AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS S/O LATE SESU POOJARY R/O SRI DURGA NILAYA UKKUDA, VITTALA KASABA VILLAGE VITTALA POST, BANTWALA TALUK DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT PIN CODE NO. 574 243 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI NEELAKANTAPPA PUJAR, HCGP FOR R1 TO R4) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE EXPARTE INJUNCTION ORDER GRANTED BY THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE, BANTWAL IN O.S NO. 354/2024 DATED 06.08.2024. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25149 WP No. 25471 of 2024 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo seeking permission to withdraw the petition. 2. The memo reads as follows: “MEMO The Advocate for the Petitioner prays that this Hon’ble Court be pleased to permit him to withdraw the above case and permit to represent by filing fresh Writ Petition in the interest of justice.” In terms of the memo, the writ petition is disposed as withdrawn. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE NVJ List No.: 2 Sl No.: 11 CT:SS