HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14010/2024 1. Hukam Singh S/o Pyar Singh, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Biloli, Police Station Malarna Dungar, District Sawai Madhopur. (Presently Confined In District Jail Sawai Madhopur). 2. Tejsingh @ Teja S/o Jagdish, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Chandnoli, Police Station Bonli, District Sawai Madhopur. (Presently Confined In District Jail Sawai Madhopur). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Umesh Dixit For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devi Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 07/01/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. on behalf of the accused-petitioners.The accused- petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.216/2024 registered at Police Station Soorwal, District Sawaimadhopur for the offence(s) under Sections 309(6) of B.N.S. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner No.1-Hukam Singh submits that he does not want to press the bail application qua petitioner No.1 Hukam Singh and seeks liberty to file afresh after filing of charge-sheet. 3. Accordingly, the bail application qua accused-petitioner-No.1- Hukam Singh is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. (2 of 3) [CRLMB-14010/2024] 4. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner No.2 Tejsingh @ Teja submits that the accused-petitioner No.2 Tejsingh @ Teja has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the name of the accused-petitioner No.2 is not mentioned in the FIR and the name of other co-accused persons namely Asharam, Hukum Singh and Nitish @ Neet have been mentioned in the FIR. It is also contended that the recovery of money was effected from other co-accused Hukum Singh. It is also contended that the police did not conduct any identification parade. The accused- petitioner is in judicial custody since long and there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner, the trial/ investigation of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner No.2-Tejsingh @ Teja may be allowed. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail appli- cation. 6. Heard and perused the factual report. 7. As per the factual report, the money was recovered from the possession of the other co-accused Hukum Singh and his name is mentioned in the FIR. The police did not find involvement of the present accused-petitioner in commission of alleged offence, therefore, considering the above facts, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner No.2-Tejsingh @ Teja on bail. 8. Accordingly, the bail application of the accused petitioner No.2-Tejsingh @ Teja under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner No.2-Tejsingh @ Teja S/o (3 of 3) [CRLMB-14010/2024] Jagdish, in connection with FIR No.216/2024 registered at Police Station Soorwal, District Sawaimadhopur, shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR), J Deepa Rani-168