Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3284 (AP)

S.Kumara Swamy v. State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/829/2018 · 2025-08-31

V Sujatha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010014932018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 829/2018 Between: 1. S.KUMARA SWAMY, S/O PATTABHI RAMAIAH AGE 59 YEARS, OCC F.P. SHOP DEALER OF SHOP NO.0982068, A.C.NAGAR, NELLORE TOWN-II, NELLORE DIST. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS EX-OFFICIO SECRETARY TO GOVT, CONSUMER AFFAIRS, FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DIST. 2. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, NERLLORE, NELLORE DIST. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, NELLORE NELLORE DIST. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, NELLORE URBAN MANDAL, NELLORE DIST. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue Writ, order or direction preferably Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in entertaining the appeal being Rc.E.453/2017 at the instance of 4th respondent against the order of the 3rd respondent dt19-5-2017 restoring the authorization o the petitioner in respect of Shop No. Shop No.0982068, A.C.Nagar, Nellore-II is are illegal, arbitrary, without authority and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently declare that the 4th respondent has no authority filed such appeal 2 VS,J W.P.No.829 of 2018 IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Stay all further proceedings in Rc.E.453/2017 on the file of 2nd respondent in respect of Shop No.0982068, A.C.Nagar, Nellore-II, pending disposal of the writ petition in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M M M SRINIVASA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES (AP) The Court made the following: 3 VS,J W.P.No.829 of 2018 ORDER: When the matter is taken up today, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Dt: 01.09.2025 KGR