Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32832 (KAR)

SMT R JAYASHREE v. M LAKSHMINARAYAN

CRP/510/2022 · 2025-02-14

R Devdas

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:6738 CRP No. 510 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 510 OF 2022 BETWEEN: SMT. R JAYASHREE AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, W/O G RAVIKUMAR R/AT NO 156/8-N2, 20TH CROSS BHAGAVATHI LAYOUT HULIMAVU BENGALURU 560076 …PETITIONER (BY SMT. HARSHITHA HIREMATH., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. UDAY K.S., ADVCOATE) AND: 1. M LAKSHMINARAYAN AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, S/O LATE MUTTAPPA 2. L CHANDRESH AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, S/O M LAKSHMINARAYANA 3. SMT L LAKSHMI AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, D/O M LAKSHMINARAYANA RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3 ARE R/A RAMASWAMY LAYOUT ARAKERE VILLAGE B G ROAD, BENGALURU 560076 Digitally signed by DHARMALINGAM Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:6738 CRP No. 510 of 2022 4. SMT SAVITHRAMMA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, W/O JAYANTH R/AT VYSORE AGRAHARA DEVARA HULIMANGALAM DENKANA KOTE TALUK TAMIL NADU 635107 5. THE SUB REGISTRAR JAYANAGAR (BTM LAYOUT) BENGALURU 560068 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SRUTI C CHAGANTI., ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3 V/O DT.29.10.2024, NOTICE TO R4 IS D/W) THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 14.09.2022 PASSED ON I.A.NO.3 IN OS.NO.6968/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE V ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU, DISMISSING THE I.A.NO.3 FILED UNDER ORDER VII RULE 11(a) AND (d) OF CPC FOR REJECTION OF PLAINT AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the original suit from out of which the present civil revision petition arises viz., O.S.No.6968/2021 was settled before Lok-Adalath on 14.12.2024. Therefore, the learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the prayer made in the civil revision petition has become infructuous. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:6738 CRP No. 510 of 2022 2. The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is placed on record. 3. Accordingly, the civil revision petition stands disposed of, since the prayer made in the civil revision petition has become infructuous. 4. Pending I.As., if any, stand disposed of. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE DL CT: JL