APHC010014882025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY ,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE B S BHANUMATHI WRIT PETITION NO: Between: Burra Sai Ratna Vijaya Lakshmi The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M SOLOMON RAJU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India is filed for the following relief: “…to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the notification dated 01 of the 4th respondent in deciding to rationalize the fair price shop No 0409004 of the petitioner in Sankhavaram Village Mandal, Kakinada District intimation, contrary to the circular instructions is respondent on 01.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY ,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE B S BHANUMATHI WRIT PETITION NO: 716/2025 Burra Sai Ratna Vijaya Lakshmi ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: Counsel for the Respondent(S): GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES following: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India is filed for the a writ order or direction more particularly one in the andamus declaring the notification dated 01 respondent in deciding to rationalize the fair price shop No 0409004 of the petitioner in Sankhavaram Village, Sankhavaram Kakinada District, without there being any notice contrary to the circular instructions issued by the 2 10.2024 as illegal, irregular, irrational without IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3311] MONDAY ,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE B S BHANUMATHI ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENT(S) This Writ Petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India is filed for the a writ order or direction more particularly one in the andamus declaring the notification dated 01.01.2025 respondent in deciding to rationalize the fair price shop No. Sankhavaram ithout there being any notice, order or sued by the 2nd , irrational without 2 BSB, J W.P.No.716 of 2025 jurisdiction and arbitrary unjust and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently grant stay of notification of the 4th respondent with respect to rationalization of the petitioner’s fair price shop No.0409004 in Sankhavaram village, Sankhavaram Mandal, Kakinada District and to pass such other order or orders…..” 2. Sri M.Solomon Raju, the learned counsel for the petitioner, requested permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition. 3. In view of the representation made on behalf of the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ B.S.BHANUMATHI, J Date: 27.01.2025 GRL 3 BSB, J W.P.No.716 of 2025 133 HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE B.S.BHANUMATHI Writ Petition No: 716/2025 Date:27.01.2025 GRL