Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32827 (BOM)

THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER MINOR IRRIGATION DIVISION NO.1 AND ANR v. KARBHARI VITHOBA KUKLARE AND ANR

CA/1460/2025 · 2025-08-12

Shri Shailesh P Brahme

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 1001(i).CA-1460-2025.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 1001 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1460 OF 2025 IN FAST/32757/2024 THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER MINOR IRRIGATION DIVISION NO.1 AND ANR VERSUS KARBHARI VITHOBA KUKLARE AND ANR ... Advocate for the Applicant : Mr. Ruturaj Chandrashekar Patil … CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. DATE : 12.08.2025 PER COURT : . Heard learned counsel for the applicants. 2. The delay of 911 days in preferring appeal is sought to be condoned for the grounds mentioned in paragraph No.2 of the application. 3. None appears for the contesting parties and the averments of the application have not been traversed. I do not find any oblique motive in preferring appeal belatedly. 4. For the reasons stated in the application, delay stands condoned. 5. Civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘A’. [ SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.] vsj.. 2025:BHC-AUG:22540