Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32823 (ALL)

RAJU AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 10 OTHERS

WRIB/1145/2025 · 2025-04-23

Chandra Kumar Rai

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:62131 Court No. - 50 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 1145 of 2025 Petitioner :- Raju And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 10 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ramesh Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Chandra Kumar Rai,J. 1. Heard Sri Ramesh Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri R.C. Srivastava, learned Addl. C.S.C. for the state-respondents. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, commanding and directing the state-respondents to restrain the private respondents from interferring in peaceful possession over the arazi no.44, situated at village/mauza Pannoi, Mahgaon, Kachhar, Police Station Sandipan Ghat, Tehsil Chayal, District Kaushambi, Uttar Pradesh." 3. Counsel for the petitioners submitted that the private respondents be restrained from interferring with the possession of the petitioners. 4. I have considered the arguments advanced by counsel for the petitioners and perused the records. 5. The prayer made in the petition, to restrain the private respondents from interferring with the peaceful possession of the petitioners in respect to arazi no.44, cannot be granted in exercise of jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 6. The writ petition is dismissed. Order Date :- 24.4.2025 C.Prakash Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad