MEENA DEVI W/O KRISHAN GOPAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/17543/2022 · 2025-05-22
Anand Sharma, Inderjeet Singh
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32814 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32814 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:21662-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17543/2022 Meena Devi W/o Krishan Gopal, R/o 97, Gurjar Mohalla, Khoh, Bharatpur, Sarpanch Of Khoh, At Present Panchayat Samiti Deeg, Bharatpur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Rural Development And Panchayati Raj, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. District Collector, Bharatpur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent(s) : Ms. Sara Parveen, Adv. on behalf of Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA
Order 22/05/2025 None present on behalf of the petitioner even in the second round. This Court while issuing notice to the respondents on 16.12.2022 passed the following order:-
“Heard. While we are not inclined to to entertain the challenge to notification dated 25.05.2022 and subsequent notification dated 03.06.2022, in view of specific ground taken in the petition that
without
consideration
of objections/representations,
impugned notification dated 02.11.2022 has been issued, let notice be issued to respondents for
consideration of this limited aspect in this petition, on payment of P.F. within one week, returnable within three weeks. List this matter after four weeks.”
[2025:RJ-JP:21662-DB] (2 of 2) [CW-17543/2022] We have perused the reply submitted on behalf of the respondents as well as the document (Annexure R-1) whereby the respondents have considered the objections/representations submitted by the aggrieved persons against the notification dated 02.11.2022 for creation/reconstitution of Panchayat Samiti, Deeg, Bharatpur, Village Khoh. In that view of the matter, considering the submissions made on behalf of the respondents as well as the contents of the reply, we deem it just and proper to close the instant writ petition.
(ANAND SHARMA),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J JYOTI /78