THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TECHNOPARK v. P. GOPAKUMAR
RP/118/2025 · 2025-03-20
Amit Rawal, Easwaran S
Review Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3281 (KER) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3281 (KER) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:KER:24686 RP NO. 118 OF 2025 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE EASWARAN S.
THURSDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF MARCH 2025 / 29TH PHALGUNA, 1946 RP NO. 118 OF 2025 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 12.11.2024 IN LA.App.
NO.239 OF 2021 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA REVIEW PETITIONER(S)/2ND RESPONDENT:
THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TECHNOPARK AGED 51 YEARS, KAZHKOOTAM.P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695582 BY ADVS. K.V.RASHMI ANIL THOMAS(T) RESPONDENT
( S )/APPELLANT, 1ST RESPONDENT
: 1 P. GOPAKUMAR AGED 53 YEARS S/O PARAMESWARAN, KUNNILVEEDU, THRIPADAPURAM NORTH, KULATHOOR P.O ., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695132 2 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031 SRI.J.G.SYAMNATH-R1 SR GP SRI T K VIPINDAS - R2 THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20.03.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
2025:KER:24686 RP NO. 118 OF 2025 2 ORDER AMIT RAWAL, J. Review petition has been filed on the ground that the land owners whose land is situated 3 kms away from National Highway cannot be granted compensation at par with the land owners whose land is very near to the highway. We have already pondered this matter while giving the judgment. It is an attempt to re-agitate the issue, which is not permissible in law. Review petition stands dismissed. Sd/- AMIT RAWAL JUDGE Sd/- EASWARAN S. JUDGE nak