SHAHNAZ BANO ANSARI D/O MOHD. ISMAIL v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/17370/2024 · 2025-07-08
Sudesh Bansal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32808 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32808 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:25169] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17370/2024 Shahnaz Bano Ansari D/o Mohd. Ismail, Aged About 34 Years, Adopted D/o Naseem Bano, R/o 94A, Bajrang Vihar, Borkheda (Borkhandi) Kota. ----Petitioner Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Director, Elementary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner.
3. District Education Officer (H.q), Jodhpur
4. Chief Block Education Officer, Panchayat Samiti Sambhar Luni, District Jodhpur.
5. Peeo, Govt. Sr. Secondary School, Kharbera, Purohitan, Block Luni, District Jodhpur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shamsuddin Ansari For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 08/07/2025
1. Petitioner preferred instant writ petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India, seeking direction against respondents to grant compassionate appointment to the petitioner in place of deceased employee- Naseem Bano, who was posted as Teacher in Government Upper Primary School, Kharabera, Bhimawatan, and passed away while in service on 03.08.2024.
[2025:RJ-JP:25169] (2 of 2) [CW-17370/2024]
2. Petitioner is claiming herself to be adopted daughter of deceased-employee and in support, unregistered document of adoption deed has been placed on record as Annexure-2.
3. On the basis of such adoption deed, this Court is not convinced about the status of petitioner as adopted daughter of the deceased-employee, moreso, when the petitioner belongs to Muslim caste, upon whom the provisions of Hindu Adoption and Maintainence Act, 1956 are not applicable.
4. Counsel for the petitioner, having instructions from petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition.
5. Permission is granted.
6. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
7. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J Sachin/22