[2025:RJ-JP:6370] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14043/2024 1. Altaf S/o Jakar, R/o Village Kaltariya, Police Station Jurhara, District Deeg, Rajasthan. 2. Hakku S/o Aaseen, R/o Village Kaltariya, Police Station Jurhara, District Deeg, Rajasthan. 3. Nannu S/o Aaseen, R/o Village Kaltariya, Police Station Jurhara, District Deeg, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankit Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP Mr. Aatish Jain, for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 12/02/2025 1. The instant pre-arrest bail application has been filed under Section 482 B.N.S.S. filed on behalf of the petitioners, who are having apprehension of arrest in FIR No.410/2023 registered at Police Station Jurhara, District Deeg for the offences under Sections 420, 406 & 120B of IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that there was money dispute between the parties and same was resolved amicably by them. It is submitted that petitioners have joined the investigation in terms of order dated 19.12.2024. Custodial interrogation of the petitioners is not required in this matter. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by counsel for the petitioners. [2025:RJ-JP:6370] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-14043/2024] 4. Learned counsel for the complainant does not dispute the factum of compromise. He submits that he has no objection if this bail application is accepted. 5. I have considered the contentions. 6. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by the counsel for the petitioners and especially the fact that money dispute has been resolved amicably by the parties; petitioners have joined the investigation in terms of order dated 19.12.2024, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the pre-arrest bail application. 7. The anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Jurhara, District Deeg in FIR No. 410/2023 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioners (1) Altaf S/o Jakar, (2) Hakku S/o Aaseen, (3) Nannu S/o Aaseen, they shall be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- each to their satisfaction on the following conditions:- (i). that the petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii). that the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii). that the petitioners shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN), J CHARU SONI /258