NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2917 of 2019 1 - Awadhesh Kumar Kushwaha S/o Shri Shivkaran Ram Aged About 35 Years R/o Village Soranga Post Office Pandopara, Police Station - Patna, District Koriya Chhattisgarh., District : Koriya (Baikunthpur), Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - South Eastern Coalfield Limited, Through Its Chairman Cum Managing Director, Headquarter At Seepat Road, Bilaspur District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Director ( Personnel ) S E C L, Headquarter At Seepat Road, Bilaspur District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3 - General Manager S E C L, Baikunthpur Area Office Baikunthpur, Post Office And Police Station Baikunthpur , District Koriya Chhattisgarh., District : Koriya (Baikunthpur), Chhattisgarh 4 - Sub Area Personnel Manager, Jhilimili Sub Area, Office At Pandavpara, Post Office And Police Station Pandavpara District - Koriya Chhattisgarh., District : Koriya (Baikunthpur), Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner : None appears even in two rounds. For Respondent/SECL : Mr. Ravi Ranjan Sinha, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 29.04.2025 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s) : “10.1 That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to call the entire records pertaining to this case. 10.2 That the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue writ in the nature of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus, directing the respondent authorities to provide employment and reasonable compensation along with the interest applicable on it, to the petitioner, and alternatively in case the respondent REKHA SINGH Digitally signed by REKHA SINGH -2- authorities fails in providing the employment and compensation to the petitioner, in lieu of his acquired land; then the land be returned back, to the petitioner, with all the consequential damages, caused to the petitioner, with such acquisition. 10.3 That Hon'ble court may kindly further be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to decide the pending representation of the petitioner pertaining to his claim of employment and compensation in accordance with law, and further to pass any other order which deems fit including cost of the petition in the interest of Justice.” 2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents would submit that at the time of acquisition of land, the petitioner was minor therefore, employment was provided to his cousin namely, Krishna Kumar. 3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the respondents. 4. Taking into consideration the fact that the employment was provided to cousin of the petitioner namely, Krishna Kumar in the year 1995 and further there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, therefore, the present petition is dismissed. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Rekha